Curating and Artefacts, meeting of Minds on AI’s and other inductive abstractions.

SÖREN KIERKEGAARD FAMOUSLY SAID , “ONCE YOU LABEL ME, YOU NEGATE ME “THIS IS WHAT KIERKEGAARD ACTUALLY SAID OR WROTE, A CLOSER PARAPHRASE IN ANY EVENT.

KIERKEGAARD SAID: “I AM NO PART OF A WHOLE, I AM NOT INTEGRATED, NOT INCLUDED. TO PUT ME IN THIS WHOLE YOU IMAGINE IS TO NEGATE ME. WHO AM I? I AM AN INTENSITY OF FEELING IN RELATION WITH BEINGS, AND PARTICULARLY WITH THE DIVINE BEING, WHO EXCITES MY DESIRE, MY KNOWLEDGE. I WANT TO BE IN A KIND OF SELF-DESTROYING CONTACT WITH GOD, THE ABSOLUTE OTHER.”

 

Curating and Artefacts, meeting of Minds on AI’s and other inductive abstractions.

https://longhairedmusings.wordpress.com/2018/06/29/embodied-energy-cost-of-opportunity-cost-which-would-be-a-true-metric-of-decision-making-where-resource-constraints-involve-mutually-exclusive-investment-decisions/comment-page-1/#comment-436

Writing a blog is also about curation especially when one changes hosting site.
I have diligently made sure all the links work in this post and the links in the posts to which it links have also been updated.
This post is around the work I have done over the past two years on Energy Metrics for Monetary units of account. The abstract basis of money renders it an apotheosical tool of circular inductive reasoning.

https://rwer.wordpress.com/2019/01/27/critical-rationalism/#comment-148033

Googles AI, its called Duplex.

This Video I saw as an introduction

It was drawing heavily on this explanation video

I also mentioned James Corbett

I mentioned James show notes every episode has full notes to links etc.

https://www.corbettreport.com/?p=28778

A few things occurred as I watched them,

This from Stafford Beer

Feed Back is Ubiquitous.

And this

The Frequency and Time domain.

Fourier Analysis is key to understanding or modelling complexity as if Finite element analysis,

http://claesjohnson.blogspot.com/2019/01/solution-of-clay-navier-stokes-problem.html

Its a question of Connections which are made or what are called edge cases in programming David,
Our sentience give us edge cases which lead us to jump outside of the box, the ting of it is that accepting the unknowable is what makes us potentially intelligent
machine learning or artificial intelligence is pretty much insane by definition in my opinion.
Emergence is the thing!

at 54 minutes is the Beer anecdote I told you about on gut feeling and wicked problems
Stafford Beer explains to a group of students his relationship with Cybernetics, the Science of Control and Communications in the animal and the machine.

Ross Ashby

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/W._Ross_Ashby

Got the details a bit wrong but the punchline regarding gut feeling.
“Follow a hunch” and if you don’t have a hunch toss a coin, the only rational thing to do.
worth watching the full thing.
one last one on Euler’s number.
https://longhairedmusings.wordpress.com/2018/06/29/embodied-energy-cost-of-opportunity-cost-which-would-be-a-true-metric-of-decision-making-where-resource-constraints-involve-mutually-exclusive-investment-decisions/

Hypathia.

Wolfram Alpha is a computational engine I like Stephen Wolfram

3 thoughts on “Curating and Artefacts, meeting of Minds on AI’s and other inductive abstractions.

  1. “The Kiss Precise” in the scientific journal Nature, which begins like this:

    For pairs of lips to kiss maybe
    Involves no trigonometry.
    This not so when four circles kiss
    Each one the other three.
    To bring this off the four must be
    As three in one or one in three.
    If one in three, beyond a doubt
    Each gets three kisses from without.
    If three in one, then is that one
    Thrice kissed internally.

    Like

  2. The Kiss Precise
    by Frederick Soddy
    For pairs of lips to kiss maybe
    Involves no trigonometry.
    ‘Tis not so when four circles kiss
    Each one the other three.
    To bring this off the four must be
    As three in one or one in three.
    If one in three, beyond a doubt
    Each gets three kisses from without.
    If three in one, then is that one
    Thrice kissed internally.

    Four circles to the kissing come.
    The smaller are the benter.
    The bend is just the inverse of
    The distance from the center.
    Though their intrigue left Euclid dumb
    There’s now no need for rule of thumb.
    Since zero bend’s a dead straight line
    And concave bends have minus sign,
    The sum of the squares of all four bends
    Is half the square of their sum.

    To spy out spherical affairs
    An oscular surveyor
    Might find the task laborious,
    The sphere is much the gayer,
    And now besides the pair of pairs
    A fifth sphere in the kissing shares.
    Yet, signs and zero as before,
    For each to kiss the other four
    The square of the sum of all five bends
    Is thrice the sum of their squares.

    In _Nature_, June 20, 1936

    https://web.archive.org/web/20180413050101/http://www.pballew.net:80/soddy.html

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s