‘Between the Lines’ – Ariana Boussard-Reifel

This is the start of a further journey into Energy Economics, Greta Thunbergs Strike and the Climate rebellion has opened up a Pandora’s box which offers the opportunity to climb aboard of the Shoulders of Past Dissenters who did not quail and did not remain quiet in the face of Censorship and false narratives.

ON CLIMATE HERESIES, WITCHHUNTS AND CIVIL DISCOURSE.
 
 
 
 “A FIRE, A FIRE IS BURNING! I HEAR THE BOOT OF LUCIFER, I SEE HIS FILTHY FACE! AND IT IS MY FACE, AND YOURS, DANFORTH! FOR THEM THAT QUAIL TO BRING MEN OUT OF IGNORANCE, AS I HAVE QUAILED, AND AS YOU QUAIL NOW WHEN YOU KNOW IN ALL YOUR BLACK HEARTS THAT THIS BE FRAUD – GOD DAMNS OUR KIND ESPECIALLY, AND WE WILL BURN, WE WILL BURN TOGETHER!”
― ARTHUR MILLER, THE CRUCIBLE

What This Book about White Supremacy and it’s essential No there being thereness.

Well, this Speech and the starting segment ;

Which refers to this Man,

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clive_Spash

Whose Blog Post references this Art piece, Between the Lines,

https://www.clivespash.org/research-topics-debates/debating-carbon-emissions-trading/

Ethics of voluntary offsets
Goodin (1994) has likened pollution permits to indulgences sold by the medieval
Catholic Church. These medieval moral sin offsets created a market whereby the
rich could pay professional pilgrims, prayers and penitents. This allowed relief
of the rich person’s conscience and less time in purgatory, without the need to
personally undertake arduous tasks or indeed stop sinning. The system replaced
personal action to address wrongdoing with a monetary transaction allowing
immoral actions to be justified. Sin would perversely increase because, for the
wealthy, indulgences provided a lower cost alternative to lengthy penances
(Ekelund et al. 1992). The analogy has also been applied to carbon offsets
(Monbiot 2006; Economist 2006). If regarded in the same way as indulgences then
GHG permits are a means of paying to undertake a wrongful act. Just as God was
the ultimate arbiter in the next life so the validity and effectiveness of GHG credits
is left for future generations to determine when they confront the impacts of
climate change and the originators of the harm have long since passed away.

p.188 Spash_Brave_New_World_NPE.pdf

#ExtinctionRebellion #GretaThunberg #ExtinctionDistinction #ConquestofDough
https://longhairedmusings.wordpress.com/2019/02/19/admiral-titleys-whopper-wheres-the-beef-in-the-hansen-feint-climate-debate-of-the-decade-mann-titley-curry-and-moore-textual-analysis/

Conclusin Spash paper

https://www.clivespash.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/04/2010_Spash_Brave_New_World_NPE.pdf

and one last embedding of a tweet today about the #InsignificantSeven

https://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js

Part IIa Mainstream Economists Shutout Reality from Clive Spash on Vimeo.

Rachel Marsden's Words

Today’s find was ‘Between the Lines’ (2007) by the American artist Ariana Boussard-Reifel…completed in 2007, it is a book facing race and erasing racism head on, a text on white supremacy completely eviscerated by the artist, word by word.

‘It is a white supremacist text that I cut every word out of. Essentially imposing the doctrine of RAHOWA, colour-based segregation, on the book itself, I removed all the black from the white, rendering it meaningless as a consequence. It was part of a series that was a response to the rise in power of The World Church of the Creator, a vitriolic white supremacist group. Beneath the surface of this simple piece are layers of meaning. Superficially it is a cheaply printed paperback with the words removed.  But with the additional knowledge that this book is a white supremacist bible and the words viciously and exactly describe the necessity…

View original post 359 more words

Admiral Titley’s Whopper, where’s the Beef in the Hansen Feint? Climate Debate of the Decade, Mann, Titley, Curry and Moore. Textual Analysis PArt 2.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLafXKLcPcQ     Admiral Titley and Dr Mann clearly double tagged on their Communication with the flock and studiously observed the Niceties of Climatology Fight club, The word tags for each segment of the debate make the point regarding storytelling absent facts and real-world observation but very strong on the monsters of the Crisis mythology. … Continue reading Admiral Titley’s Whopper, where’s the Beef in the Hansen Feint? Climate Debate of the Decade, Mann, Titley, Curry and Moore. Textual Analysis PArt 2.

Textual Analysis Climate Debate of the decade.

The first rule of debating climate Change is, Don't debate Climate change, and as what happens at fight club stays at Fight club, what Happens in the Scientific Academy must not trouble the Simple stories which Climate Communicators use to break it down for the Flock. The idea is that in matters as difficult as … Continue reading Textual Analysis Climate Debate of the decade.