THE SATURDAY ESSAY: blind belief has nothing to offer clear-sighted government

The issue of usury has been at the centre of politics for several thousand years, and continues to be. It’s the central issue behind the Yellow Vests demonstrations, now not only in France. It’s a central issue in the Treaty of Lisbon, which puts all of the EU countries at the mercy of international bankers. It’s a central issue in wars and the pretexts for wars.

Oceana or Eurasia.

On the sixth day of Hate Week, after the processions, the speeches, the shouting, the singing, the banners, the posters, the films, the waxworks, the rolling of drums and squealing of trumpets, the tramp of marching feet, the grinding of the caterpillars of tanks, the roar of massed planes, the booming of guns — after six days of this, when the great orgasm was quivering to its climax and the general hatred of Eurasia had boiled up into such delirium that if the crowd could have got their hands on the 2,000 Eurasian war-criminals who were to be publicly hanged on the last day of the proceedings, they would unquestionably have torn them to pieces — at just this moment it had been announced that Oceania was not after all at war with Eurasia. Oceania was at war with Eastasia. Eurasia was an ally.

There was, of course, no admission that any change had taken place. Merely it became known, with extreme suddenness and everywhere at once, that Eastasia and not Eurasia was the enemy. …

Oceania was at war with Eastasia: Oceania had always been at war with Eastasia. A large part of the political literature of five years was now completely obsolete. Reports and records of all kinds, newspapers, books, pamphlets, films, sound-tracks, photographs — all had to be rectified at lightning speed. Although no directive was ever issued, it was known that the chiefs of the Department intended that within one week no reference to the war with Eurasia, or the alliance with Eastasia, should remain in existence anywhere.

The Slog.

mesmile2 The currently insoluble difficulty of writing something honest, factual and balanced on the subjects of multiculturalism, religious, gender and sexual tolerance or Brexit at the moment is roughly as follows. One attracts vapid disapproval on the one hand, and the approval of the rabid on the other. Both are deadly enemies of the society at ease with itself. The United Kingdom desperately needs a frank reexamination of the balance between factual reality and fanciful doctrine. The only way I can see this happening is via the peaceful demolition of ‘Whiteminster’ by a movement with its roots firmly established in the rich soil of reasonable, thoughtful and open-minded citizens.


For a nation that thinks of itself as made from stern stuff, our willingness to let anyone stand on the collective British windpipe is quite something to observe at the moment. Three and a half million female State pensioners ordered…

View original post 2,268 more words


Partisan Girl, Goes back to School. Do all Celebrities believe their own BS? @Partisangirl #ConquestofDough

12 & Part 2 Notes


This Blog is work in progress for the final few chapters of my Novel Conquest of Dough,
As such I am saving my creative juices and prosaic flourishes for the novel and shovelling through the hard yards here. Pretty Pictures appear more easily in my Steemit blog and regular readers might prefer to look at these notes there.

In the middle of this lot, there are two excellent links to the Political Economy of Herods Palestine its monetary history of the Second Temple period and giving much more force to the political aspects of Jesus throwing the money lenders from the temple.


The truth will indeed set you free, but it will certainly first piss most off.




To untangle Brexit you have to disentangle everything else.
The Main Theme of dominant narratives of the 21st Century since 2000, 9/11
war on terror, Climate Beliefs and Haulocaustianity, Denialist Thoughtcrime and thought crime denunciation, Political Correctness, Identity politics, Divide and Rule, Media, Social Media, Censorship, Self-censorship. Peer Pressure Peer review, Star Worship, Cults of personality,
With that list, this list of Wells’s from The fate of Mann quoted in My poem Globalisation Unentangled.
Cabalists, Gnostics, Manichaeans, the Old Man
of the Mountains, Knight Templars, Satanists,
Rosicrucians, Illuminati, Freemasons, Rousseau,
Voltaire, Cagliostro, Madame Blavatsky, Mrs. Besant,
Trade Unions, Anarchists, Socialists, Theosophists,
Communists, Those Bolsheviks, a frightful horde
all plotting and getting hold of power and handing
it on and doing down Christianity and the Christian life
Wells The Fate of Man.p.259

the idea before it was clothed in words

October 25, 2017 at 11:51 pm
Things are really hotting up on the Future Prospects of the Petro Dollar. Climate Change particularly the AGW CO2 Narrative is clung to with religious zeal and promoted by Finance Elites, why is that?
China are rolling out the Petro Yuan, backed by gold.
The IMF wish to cling to the Petro Dollar hegemon this is best done by having the Carbon Based Dollar.
Gold had much religious significance in early civilisations, it was spread in foundations of the Delphi Temple, for instance, connecting a monetary commodity to a religious cult is nothing new.
The little-discussed Brandt Plan and various post-2008 Crash Central Bank position papers show what guides Legardes public comments.
Climate Politics is wrapped up in Debt based money politics and the basis of Capitalism Expect an uptick in Climate Propaganda the Banks really can not afford to let the Absurd narrative go.
Mike Stobbie shared a link.
6 hrs ·

1 Comment

Roger Lewis Is it any more stupid to choose Oceana over Eurasia, 1984 is now a hand book and not fiction?…/vlad-the-bad…/–c7RTB7IFwozQpr4wO_Uzlg3Z-bk

“I keep six honest serving-men
They taught me all I knew
Their names are What and Why and When
And How and Where and Who.”
Rudyard Kipling

In 2013, the European Commission began working on a new EU law that aims to end tax-dodging practices within its member states, the single market and the customs union, but yet again, the British wealthy tax-dodging elite, exploited the Mainstream Media to deliver Brexit and to save their tax-free assets from the Inland Revenue.
But what is the truth?
In the year 1902, Rudyard Kipling identified What, Why, When, How, Where and Who as his “six honest serving-men” that helped him determine the truth.
Therefore, whenever someone seeks the truth, one needs to address the following questions:
1. What happened?
2. When did it happen?
3. Who supported it?
4. Why did it happen?
5. Where did it take place?
6. How did it happen?
The “six honest serving-men” or the “6 Ws” constitutes a proven method that is applied to determine the truth.
It seeks to identify the common factor that is consistent with each answer deriving from the questions What, Why, When, How, Where and Who.
The following text provides an overall insight into Brexit’s affiliation with each of the “6 Ws” that seems to suggest that the new EU Anti Tax Avoidance Directive is the main reason why the UK is leaving the EU.



So for negotiating this Labarynth, I offer this rather long, although informative, Ball of String ( As Ariadne gave to Theseus), a Dialogue that was published in the early seventies of a disputation between Skousen and Quigley,Authors both of Two Books dealing with the same material as dealt with here on this site and by extention the Novel , “The Conquest of Dough”
So take good head of the Old Poem, The Elephant of Hindustan and Read this diialogue ,

Renewing Europe
European citizens need to learn from the Brexit impasse and apply those lessons ahead of and after the European Parliament election in May. That means embracing reforms that advance the three goals that lie at the heart of the European project.
President Macron gives new impetus to the necessary debate about Europe’s future challenges. On present trajectory we risk become a play-board, rather than being a player, in the global great power competition. President Macron helps us to see the necessity of doing better.
President Macron offers a wise and hopeful way forward which rejects negative and self-harming nationalism and gives the Europe of which we are all a part a road map for the future.
Indeed one size does not fit all and Mr Macron is, in pursuing the EU Political Project at the expense of democracy, telling us a deeper truth about EU Technocracy.
The Eu is deeply anti-democratic. The UK Spring will be a European Spring no amount of Potemkin Village pretence will fool the European Public further, Once bitten twice shy, En Marche or On Yer Bike?
Read less
• This comment has not been approved. Please note that we moderate comments to ensure the conversation remains topically relevant. We appreciate well-informed comments and welcome your criticism and insight. Please be civil and avoid name-calling and ad hominem remarks.
That really does say it all. Macron is beyond Absurd in his absurd egotistical lack of self Awareness
this is typical of his Elitist Caste of Technocratic determinists.
The Neo-Liberal project is dead on the vine and morphing it into Overt Fascism and perpetual war of the boots on the ground kind seems to be the Technocratic Faction of the Oligarchies death rattle intent.
Macron Is Irrelevant as is George Soros and the NGO, Foundation illusion of free speech complex. #WrongKindofGreen
The French people want Macron Gone, the peoples of Europe want democracy and a celebration of National Identities and Cultures, Language, Customs and Idyosynconisities the One Size fits all Do as we say not as we do Feudalism of the Eussr has been rejected many times Yet the EU is a Political Project but not a democratic one and that is the Problem Mr Macron, I do not Call you Mr President as I do not think your regime is legitimate.

Vive le France and les Gillette Jaune, nil passerant No Pasarán They will not pass. Vive le Europe vive les nations vive le difference.

It may be wishful thinking or just parochialism, but I am extremely encouraged by the fact that this stirring appeal for “more Europe” begins and ends with the challenge of Brexit. Perhaps this suggest a recognition that Brexit now presents the biggest threat but also the biggest opportunity for Europe. If Brexit goes ahead it will not only damage European prosperity and security by removing the EU’s second biggest economy and biggest military power. Much worse, it will demonstrate that the EU and the euro are not irreversible and will therefore give credibility and legitimacy to the nationalist forces in Italy, France, Germany the Netherlands and other countries campaigning to break up the EU and the euro.

But if Britain changes its mind and decides to remain in Europe, all the nationalist political movements inspired and legitimized by Brexit will be ruined. The French National Rally, Italian League and German AfD would against be dismissed as fantasists and confined to the lunatic fringe of politics. Whether Brexit actually happens depends on the decisions to be made within the next few days by EU leaders. If Macron really wants to combat nationalism and strengthen Europe, the best thing he could do is create conditions for Brexit to be delayed until 2020 – and give Britain the time it needs to change its mind.

Europe, Please Wake Up

The main stream is the home of a lot of convention and the conventional is not always either correct or even the best way forward but it is accepted. Academia particularly as it is now like everything else hijacked by the corporate does tend to carry on in the direction its sponsors approve of. Its a shame that Brian Cox seems to have bought into the Mainstream conventional corporate narratives

This clip of Cox demonstrating standing waves is very amusing he seems like a nice guy and I enjoyed his Desert island discs I think he did that there was a longish interview I listened to any way. I do like the term Nobber its very descriptive. ( we should all me more in touch with our inner Nobber.)

Moving towards an energy based metric for Value Distribution systems away from a scarcity/debt based economic model of Capitalism and Usury is assisted with a little insight into dissenting views on Big Bang and Singularity conceptions of Quantum Mechanics.
Ideology does go to the root of Scientism attitudes towards Freewill or determinism. Deterministic World Views Favour Big Bang, Free WILL ARE MORE OPEN TO INFINITY CONCEPTIONS AND ABUNDANCE.
The point regarding Quantum Mechanics and the Copenhagen Interpretation is that it is a consensus based theory not an empirical one.
By far the best introductory book on this question is by Swedens enfant terrible of Applied Mathmatics Claes Olsson.
Download it here.


Untangling Cognitive Dissonance Part 2.


Albert Einstein who has been horribly misrepresented and badly served with lesser people hitching a lift on his broad intellectual shoulders.
I consider it quite possible that physics cannot be based on the field concept, i. e., on continuous structures. In that case nothing remains of my entire castle in the air gravitation theory included, [and of] the rest of modern physics. — Albert Einstein


There is a lot of baiting going on Share this it nails how peaceful protest and non-violent civil disobedience is the most effective driver for change.

Also beware
Share this widely it contains info on being safe online and being safe during public unrest
Conditioning (a poem)
Pleasantries exchanged with the peasantry, what is intact of the real me?all is not as it seems in the wide world, not all sincerity is sincere you see.of caves and reflections, insults and deflections no application no rejection, in actions and deeds examples and needs those conditioned minds Baron of seeds.

Addicted to Distracted By Bruce Charlton Makes for compelling if Uncomfortable reading.
It will offend most readers but he has a very good point, I do not share his pessimism but the rest is hard to argue with.
“People and events presented by the media as Good are always in reality bad; and people or events presented by the media as bad are usually (but not always) Good – and when bad people or events are not presented as Good, then they are condemned as bad for the wrong reasons.
Also, if genuinely Good things happen to be presented as Good by the Mass Media; then it will invariably be the case that they also are said to be Good for the wrong reasons.
Thus, the major output of the modern international Mass Media consists of only four categories:
1. Good presented as bad
2. Bad presented as Good
(That is to say simple inversion)
3. Good presented as Good for a bad reason
4. Bad presented as bad for a bad reason
(That is to say explanatory inversion)
These four categories, which can be summarized as either simple or explanatory inversion, account for all sustained and high impact modern major Mass Media stories without any exceptions.
Therefore those who want to free their minds from the Mass Media must first avoid as much Mass Media output as possible, and secondly develop automatic negativistic behaviour towards the Mass Media output which they cannot avoid”.

Authentic Discourses on Decisions to Act.
A golden Rule in folklores Canon
holds what’s sauce for the goose is sauce for the Gander
do unto others that which to you would be done
thus applied in discussion, we should always avoid slander.
Leave at the first introduction
the habits of Authority and induction
When those listening seem deaf to what you tell
refrain if you please from poisoning the well
if your working hypothesis requires certitude
refrain from tailoring cloth that renders the emperor nude
If to your point, you wish others to allude
refrain from a hypocritical sneering attitude.
When your correspondent appeals to evidence
consider their sources, were they well meant?
In all matters, skepticism will serve you with equivalence
and always remember to mistrust the Government.
“man müsse das Volk stets in Armuth erhalten, damit es gehorsam bleibe.”(2)
Belloc characterised the reformation as
´´a rising of the rich against the poor´´,(1)
´and indeed Calvin had written the unfortunate statement:
´´The people must always be kept in poverty in order that they remain obedient´´.(2)
p.198 Lost Science of Money.(1)

Multivariate analysis indicates that economic elites and organized groups representing business interests have substantial
independent impacts on U.S. government policy, while average citizens and mass-based interest groups have little or no
independent influence. The results provide substantial support for theories of Economic-Elite Domination and for theories of
Biased Pluralism, but not for theories of Majoritarian Electoral Democracy or Majoritarian Pluralism.

November 20th 2014 The power of lobbies
Sometimes stories in the news can make you wonder who is really pulling the strings. This 10-minute video exposes the role corporate lobby groups have in EU decision-making – who they are, how they get what they want, and how they affect you, and others like you all over Europe, from the food on your plate, to rules for bankers, to the chemicals allowed in everyday products. Watch, learn, and share! For more information you can also consult our Lobby Planet guide to the Brussels bubble. And get involved!
If you’d like to research the world of corporate lobbying, we have put together a list of free online tools that can help.
The EU corporate lobby tour. As Long as the Corporate Shadow falls over Brexit or Remain the Substance will not change.

EU enlargement and The monetary union had already become a bridge too far for many British Voters by the time of the Maastricht treaty. The  Lisbon was a bridge too far. to mix a metaphor, The straw that broke the camels back. The Irish The Danes, The Swedes, The Dutch pretty much most populations consulted have not given the EU zealots the right answer the first time around and the EU elite simply refused to see the point and have now simply adopted the expediency of not asking.
Two pieces of folk wisdom spring to mind.
Richard Bach.


With Two Prize Village Idiots on either side of the Atlantic Vyeing for Moron of the Year and possibly the Nobel Peace Prize. Such, level’s of degeneracy in the Civic realm have been known before and often.
This from Shelly in 1817 but if you prefer to try this from Edmund Burke in  1770

“The government which the imperfect constitution of our representative assembly threw into the hands of a few aristocrats, improved the method of anticipating the taxes by loans, invented by the ministers of William III, until an enormous debt had been created. In the war against the Republic of France, this policy was followed up, until now, the mere interest of the public debt amounts to more than twice as much as the lavish expenditure of the public treasure, for maintaining the standing army, and the royal family, and the pensioners, and the placemen. The effect of this debt is to produce such an unequal distribution of the means of living, as saps the foundation of social union and civilized life. It creates a double aristocracy, instead of one which was sufficiently burthensome before, and gives twice as many people the liberty of living in luxury and idleness, on the produce of the industrious and the poor.


mais par impatience de souffrir
On the present discontents, Burke opined
Putin ,Trump and Farage set courses un-entangled
Junker , Merkel, Call for straight ahead.
The fist problem is that twitter is arbitrary in it’s standards. Some people can get away with all sorts of things, others get banned for saying things that would seem to be objectively true.

500 Million Debt-Serfs: The European Union Is a Neo-Feudal Kleptocracy (July 22, 2011)

The banks of Europe are the new Feudal Manors and Masters. All Europeans now serve them as debt-serfs in one way or another.
If we knock down all the flimsy screens of artifice and obscuring complexity, what we see in Europe is a continent of debt-serfs, indentured to the banks under the whip of the European Union and its secular religion, the euro.

I know this isn’t the pretty picture presented by the EU Overlords, of a prosperity built not just on debt, but on resolving the problem of debt with more debt, but it is the reality behind the eurozone’s phony facade of economic “freedom.”

What else can we call the stark domination of the big banks other than Neo-Feudalism? In one way or another, every one of the 27-member nations’ citizens are indentured to the big international banks at risk in Europe, most of which are based in Europe.

The E.U., Neofeudalism and the Neocolonial-Financialization Model (May 24, 2012)

To fully understand the Eurozone’s financial-debt crisis, we must dig through the artifice, obfuscation and propaganda to the real dynamics of Europe’s “new feudalism,” the Neocolonial-Financialization Model.

Forget “austerity”and political theater–the only way to truly comprehend the Eurozone is to understand the Neocolonial-Financialization Model, as that’s the key dynamic of the Eurozone.
In the old model of Colonialism, the colonizing power conquered or co-opted the Power Elites of the region, and proceeded to exploit the new colony’s resources and labor to enrich the “center,” i.e. the home empire.

In Neocolonialism, the forces of financialization (debt and leverage controlled by State-approved banking cartels) are used to indenture the local Elites and populace to the banking center: the peripheral “colonials” borrow money to buy the finished goods sold by the “core,” doubly enriching the center with 1) interest and the transactional “skim” of financializing assets such as real estate, and 2) the profits made selling goods to the debtors.

In essence, the “core” nations of the E.U. colonized the “peripheral” nations via the financializing euro, which enabled a massive expansion of debt and consumption in the periphery. The banks and exporters of the “core” countries exacted enormous profits from this expansion of debt and consumption.


Part of the Grangemouth petrochemical plant in Scotland; the site has been an oil refinery since 1924

Part of the Ineos facility in Wilhelmshaven, Germany
Inspec had been formed by Sir Jim Ratcliffe, previously a director of US private equity group Advent International, and John Hollowood in 1992 to undertake a management buy-in of British Petroleum’s (BP) chemicals arm.[4][5] In 1995 Inspec bought BP’s ethylene oxide and glycol business for £78 million.[6] Ineos was subsequently established as a company in 1998 by Inspec director Ratcliffe to buy-out Inspec’s ethylene oxide facility in Antwerp, Belgium.[7][8] The £84 million buy-out was funded by Scottish investment house Murray Johnstone (£10 million), Ineos management (£1.5 million), and investment bank BT Alex Brown (£72.5 million raised through junk bonds).[6][7][9][10]

Extinction Rebellion , Who is George “Blackmore” Barda?

Please listen here and subscribe to our Speaker Channel:
The Globalist Fake Revolution Part 1
The Globalist Fake Revolution Part 2
The Globalists need the Anti Globalists to use for their protests and from “Occupy” onwards the protests advance the goals of “Sustainable Development” and the UN Agenda 2030 Global Action Plan.

“The common enemy of humanity is man.
In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up
with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming,
water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these
dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through
changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome.
The real enemy then, is humanity itself.”
– Club of Rome

The First Global Revolution
The environmental movement has been described as the largest and most influential social phenomenon in modern history. From relative obscurity just a few decades ago it has spawned thousands of organisations and claims millions of committed activists. Reading the newspaper today it is hard to imagine a time when global warming, resource depletion, environmental catastrophes and ‘saving the planet’ were barely mentioned. They now rank among the top priorities on the social, political and economic global agenda.

Environmental awareness is considered to be the mark of any good honest decent citizen. Multi-national companies compete fiercely to promote their environmental credentials and ‘out-green’ each other. The threat of impending ecological disasters is uniting the world through a plethora of international treaties and conventions. But where did this phenomenon come from, how did it rise to such prominence, and more importantly, where is it going?

While researching for these articles, and during my academic studies, I have come across many references to the The Club of Rome (CoR), and reports produced by them. Initially I assumed that they were just another high-level environmental think-tank and dismissed the conspiracy theories found on many websites claiming that the CoR is a group of global elitists attempting to impose some kind of one world government.

I am not a conspiratorial person by nature and was faced with a dilemma when I first read their reports. But it’s all there – in black and white. The CoR claims that “we are facing an imminent catastrophic ecological collapse” and “our only hope is to transform humanity into a global interdependent sustainable society, based on respect and reverence for the Earth.” In the end I came to the conclusion that there are two possibilities – either the CoR wrote all these reports and setup a vast network of supporting organisations just for fun or they actually believe what they have written and are working hard to fulfill their role as the self-appointed saviours of Gaia.
• Global Revolution
• The Turning Point
• Gaia’s Gurus
• The Green Web
• Global Consciousness
• The Great Shift
• Sustainable Development
• Agenda 21
• The Earth Charter
• A United World
• The Gaia Hypothesis
• Deep Ecology
• The Spiritual UN
• A United Faith
• Settled Science?
• What about Greenland?
• The Carbon Currency
• A New Economy

Herod’s Temple
Jesus and the Temple
It was the Passover, and both Jewish and non-Jewish pilgrims alike from all over the world would come to Jerusalem to seek after God at the Temple. They would come marching through the hills singing and rejoicing of the great things that God has done. It was a wonderful time of joy and festivity. Once they arrived, the foreigners would come to the Court of the Gentiles (or in its porch), and they would be confronted with the “moneychangers.” When Jesus saw them He made a whip of cords and drove them all out of the Temple and said “Do not make My Father’s house a house of merchandise!”
The large outer court was called “the Court of the Gentiles” because it was devoted to the foreigners who had come to worship God at the Temple and they could proceed no further. It is interesting that Jesus chose to stop at this place to show forth His anger toward the moneychangers, the Court of the “Gentiles,” and this was not the first time that He came to the aid of non-Jews.
The profanity and abuse of the moneychangers was no small thing. They treated the foreign guests with much contempt and even the Jewish authorities constantly scorned this place and abused the pilgrims who came to worship.
The Money Changers
The word “moneychanger” means money-banker or money-broker. They would make large profits at the expense of the pilgrims. Every Israelite, rich or poor, who had reached the age of twenty was obligated to pay a half shekel as an offering to Jehovah into the sacred treasury. This tribute was in every case to be paid in the exact Hebrew half shekel. At Passover everyone in the world who was an adult male and wished to worship at the Temple would bring his “offering” or purchase a sacrificial animal at the Temple. Since there was no acceptance of foreign money with any foreign image the money changers would sell “Temple coinage” at a very high rate of exchange and assess a fixed charge for their services.
The judges, who sat to inspect the offerings that were brought by the pilgrims, were quick to detect any blemish in them. This was expensive for the wealthy pilgrims, not to say how ruinous this was for the poor who could only offer their turtle-doves and pigeons. There was no defense for them or court of appeal, seeing that the priestly authorities took a large percentage on every transaction.
The House of God or the National Treasury
Jesus referred to the Temple as the “House of God” and called it a “House of Prayer,” not just for the Jews, but for all nations. When Jesus arrived with the mass of pilgrims, He overturned the tables and called it a den of thieves and a house of merchandise. The Temple was in some sense the national bank. It was a great public treasury with vaults containing immense stores of private wealth. These deposits never sat idle, but were loaned at high rates of interest. The Jewish historian Josephus wrote an account of the burning of the archives in Jerusalem and it gives an appalling picture of the incredible debts that were owed by the poor to the rich. It is believed that the intention of the burning was to ‘destroy the money-lenders’ tallies and to prevent the exaction of debts. After reading about how an infuriated mob (around 30 years later) robbed the Temple booths and dragged the sons of Annas to their death, it can only be imagined how much the Jewish authorities were hated by the humble commoners.
The Wealthy and the Poor
There was tremendous wealth in Jerusalem. Many of the rich publicans (tax-gatherers) and influential leaders resided in Jerusalem, not only in their houses, but their summer residences, their large parks, and their country estates. Their vast wealth reached unbelievable proportions in the days of Herod. These plutocratic families were powerful in government circles and “prided themselves in their excesses.” The gulf between the rich and the poor was immense and the very poor families were often driven from their homes to become the slum-dwellers of Jerusalem.
By the time of Jesus Jerusalem had become a parasitic city, lying in wait for the multitudes of pilgrims who flocked into the city in their hundreds of thousands at each Festival. At the Passover there would be at least a million visitors, and Josephus multiplies this figure by four.
Jesus promised the religious aristocracy that their “Temple would be left desolate,” and not a single stone of the Temple would be left on top of another that would not be thrown down. Not even forty years passed when it all happened, for in 70 A.D. the legions of Rome came, led by Titus, and the Words of Christ were fulfilled.

The coming of the Roman Empire destroyed the community-based economy that God had provided for the children of Israel.
1. The Sadducees and the priestly families that collaborated with the Romans were rewarded with large land holdings. Many accumulated large blocks of land. The people who had previously owned them were turned into tenant farmers, who had to hand over at least half of their crops to their landlords.
2. The empire imposed exorbitant taxes on the ordinary people. This pushed most families into poverty. If taxes could not be paid, their property would be confiscated. The tax collectors got rich and the rest became tenant farmers or day labourers. Jesus saw the tax collectors as “sick” (Luke 5:31).
3. For ordinary people, storing up wealth was impossible. If the Roman soldiers found coins or grain hidden in a house, they would smash the house.
4. Debt was used to impoverish people and to steal their land. A person who was poor would be lent money at very high interest rates (50 percent) using their land as security. When they were unable to pay the interest or repay the loan, the interest would be added to the loan. In a few years, a small loan could grow to be worth more than the land given as security. The lender would demand the land to settle the debt.
5. Herod built a Greek-styled temple in Jerusalem. His son Antipas built the new Roman cities at Deopolis and Tiberius. The governor of Judea built a new city of Caesar Philip in honour of Caesar. To pay for these building projects, the people had to pay tribute.
6. People were hungry all the time.
During those days another large crowd gathered. Since they had nothing to eat, Jesus called his disciples to him and said, “I have compassion for these people; they have already been with me three days and have nothing to eat. If I send them home hungry, they will collapse on the way (Mark 8:1-3).
The state of people’s health was so bad that going without food was debilitating.
7. By Jesus time, most families in Israel had no land. Most of the land was controlled by a few powerful families and moneylenders. Tax collectors and soldiers would grab most of the crops that were grown and most money that was earned. The people were left with very little to live on. Most people were hungry most of the time. Many would have to find some work each day as a day labourer to buy their food for the day. That is why Jesus knew the people had followed him around the lake to listen to his teaching all day would be hungry. If they had not worked, they would have no food, and not be able to buy any.
For the people of Israel, the Roman Empire was a terrible place to live. Land was concentrated in the hands of a few. Capital was no longer distributed evenly. The people did not have money to lend to others, because all surpluses were taken by the Romans and the temple system. Life was brutal and extreme poverty was normal. No wonder people were looking for a Messiah who would break the shackles of Rome and free them from the burden of debt, tax and tribute.

One Hundred Ninety Years of Tyrian Shekels
by Yakov Meshorer
Studies in Honor of Leo Mildenburg
Numismatics, Art History, Archaeology
Wetteren, 1984, pp.171-180.

The Tyrian shekels held a prominant position among the best known coins of the ancient world. From 126/5 A.D. 70 they circulated extensively in the Middle East, mainly in the regions of Phoenicia, Galilee, Judea, Syria and Transjordan.
Both because of the decline of the Seleucid Empire and the rise of Tyrian economic and commercial power, the mint of Tyre stoppped striking Seleucid coins (the latest being issues of Demetrius II)[BMCSeleucids Kings 76.], and began to strike autonomous silver shekels as a continuation of the Seleucid tetradrachms. The weights of the autonomous coinage did not change from that of the preceeding Seleucid coinage; even its design did not differ much. The obverse of the new issue depicts the head of Heracles-Melkart instead of the Seleucid king, and the reverse shows an eagle standing on the prow of a ship with a palm branch over its shoulder, similar to that which appeared on the earlier Seleucid issues.
The new term is Holocaustianity [8] and perhaps a quintessential example of what Jacobs describes is the following (Justman, 1995: 73):
The story is told that after his escape from the Warsaw ghetto a famous rabbi was invited to see Winston Churchill and advise him on how to bring about Germany’s defeat. The rabbi (the story goes) replied as follows: ‘There are two possible ways, one involving natural means, the other supernatural. The natural means would be if a million angels with flaming swords were to descend on Germany and destroy it. The supernatural would be if a million Englishmen parachuted down on Germany and destroyed it.’ Churchill, being a realist, chose the natural method, angels with flaming swords.
TEDx talk under review

TEDx talk under review
Posted by: TED Staff

An independently organized TEDx event recently posted, and subsequently removed, a talk from the TEDx YouTube channel that the event organizer titled: “Why our perception of pedophilia has to change.”
After reviewing the talk, we believe it cites research in ways that are open to serious misinterpretation. This led some viewers to interpret the talk as an argument in favor of an illegal and harmful practice. TED would like to make clear that it does not promote pedophilia.
In the TEDx talk, a speaker described pedophilia as a condition some people are born with, and suggested that if we recognize it as such, we can do more to prevent those people from acting on their instincts and harming children. This field of science is developing, and the definition of the condition is just one of many points that are in debate across the global scientific community (and even in standard reference works).

William Tyndale (/ˈtɪndəl/;[1] sometimes spelled Tynsdale, Tindall, Tindill, Tyndall;  1494 –  6 October 1536) was an English scholar who became a leading figure in the Protestant Reformation in the years leading up to his execution. He is well known for his translation of the Bible into English.
He was influenced by the work of Desiderius Erasmus, who made the Greek New Testament available in Europe, and by Martin Luther.[2] A number of partial translations had been made from the seventh century onward, but the spread of Wycliffe’s Bible in the late 14th century led to the death penalty for anyone found in unlicensed possession of Scripture in English, although translations were available in all other major European languages.[3]

‘Why is the Strasbourg Parliament based on Tower of Babel?’

BIBLICAL MODEL: The founders of the European Union used this picture of the Tower of Babel by renaissance painter Peter Bruegel on some of its posters over the years with the phrase in French “Many tongues, one voice.” David Hathaway was told by a journalist that members of the European Parliament knew what the Tower of Babel was and what it meant.

CARBON COPY: Is the Strasbourg Parliament building meant to look like the unfinished Tower of Babel mentioned in the Old Testament? If Scripture is a dead book and of no relevance, why is this based on a biblical design – according to Parliament officials themselves?

The three-class franchise system (German: Dreiklassenwahlrecht) was an indirect election system used from 1848 to 1918 in the Kingdom of Prussia, and for shorter intervals in other German states. Voters were grouped into three classes such that those who paid most tax formed the first class, those who paid least formed the third, and the aggregate tax revenue of each class was equal. Voters in each class separately elected one third of the electors (Wahlmänner) who in turn voted for the representatives. Thus it was a form of apportionment by economic class rather than geographic area or population.


This section contains information of unclear or questionable importance or relevance to the article’s subject matter. Please help improve this section by clarifying or removing indiscriminate details. If importance cannot be established, the section is likely to be moved to another article, pseudo-redirected, or removed.
Find sources: “Prussian three-class franchise” – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR (October 2018) (Learn how and when to remove this template message)
Using data on individual-level roll call votes from parliamentary minutes of the Prussian House of Representatives during the period 1867 to 1903, researchers computed scores for MPs measuring political ideology. They find that voting behavior can be classified into two dimensions: a liberal–conservative dimension and a secular–religious dimension which combine to correctly predict 96% of roll call votes. Linking estimated ideal points with biographical information of MPs and with constituency-level variables, they analyze the driving forces of the Prussian political economy during a period of fundamental changes towards capitalism, secularization, and from liberalism to protectionism. They find different forms of inequality to be associated with competing political ideologies casting a more nuanced light on the three-class system of franchises.
Frederick William III submitted Prussia to a number of administrative reforms, among others reorganising the government by way of ministries, which remained formative for the following hundred years.
As to religion, reformed Calvinist Frederick William III—as Supreme Governor of the Protestant Churches—asserted his long-cherished project (started in 1798) to unite the Lutheran and the Reformed Church in 1817, (see Prussian Union). The Calvinist minority, strongly supported by its co-religionist Frederick William III, and the partially reluctant Lutheran majority formed the united Protestant Evangelical Church in Prussia. However, ensuing quarrels causing a permanent schism among the Lutherans into united and Old Lutherans by 1830.
As a consequence of the Revolutions of 1848, the Principalities of Hohenzollern-Sigmaringen and Hohenzollern-Hechingen (ruled by a Catholic cadet branch of the House of Hohenzollern) were annexed by Prussia in 1850, later united as Province of Hohenzollern.
1848–1871: German wars of unification
For the half-century that followed the Congress of Vienna, there was a conflict of ideals within the German Confederation between the formation of a single German nation and the conservation of the current collection of smaller German states and kingdoms. The creation of the German Customs Union (Zollverein) in 1834, which excluded the Austrian Empire, increased Prussian influence over the member states. As a consequence of the Revolutions of 1848, King Frederick William IV was offered the crown of a united Germany by the Frankfurt Parliament. Frederick William refused the offer on the grounds that revolutionary assemblies could not grant royal titles. But there were two other reasons why he refused: to do so would have done little to end the internal power struggle between Austria and Prussia, and all Prussian kings (up to and including William I) feared that the formation of a German Empire would mean the end of Prussia’s independence within the German states.
In 1848 actions taken by Denmark towards the Duchies of Schleswig and Holstein led to the First War of Schleswig (1848–51) between Denmark and the German Confederation, resulting in a Danish victory.
Frederick William issued Prussia’s first constitution by his own authority in 1848. This document—moderate by the standards of the time but conservative by today’s standards—provided for a two-house parliament. The lower house, or Landtag was elected by all taxpayers, who were divided into three classes whose votes were weighted according to the amount of taxes paid. Women and those who paid no taxes had no vote. This allowed just over one-third of the voters to choose 85% of the legislature, all but assuring dominance by the more well-to-do men of the population. The upper house, which was later renamed the Herrenhaus (“House of Lords”), was appointed by the king. He retained full executive authority and ministers were responsible only to him (indeed, as late as 1910, Prussian kings believed that they ruled by divine right). As a result, the grip of the landowning classes, the Junkers, remained unbroken, especially in the eastern provinces.
Frederick William suffered a stroke in 1857, and his younger brother, Prince William, became regent. William pursued a considerably more moderate policy. Upon Frederick William IV’s death in 1861, he succeeded to the throne as William I. However, shortly after gaining the throne, he faced a dispute with his parliament over the size of the army. The parliament, dominated by the liberals, balked at William’s desire to increase the number of regiments and withheld approval of the budget to pay for its cost. A deadlock ensued, and William seriously considered abdicating in favour of his son, Crown Prince Frederick William. He was, however, persuaded to appoint as prime minister Otto von Bismarck, his ambassador to France. Bismarck took office on September 23, 1862.

“EDUCATION” PART TWO – Find out what the Prussian/Hindu Caste System “education system” was REALLY all about. – State Mind Control. AND A NEVER ENDING CONVEYER BELT OF OBEDIENT UNQUESTIONING MORONS

“EDUCATION” PART TWO – Find out what the Prussian/Hindu Caste System “education system” was REALLY all about. – State Mind Control. AND A NEVER ENDING CONVEYER BELT OF OBEDIENT UNQUESTIONING MORONS

EU Idiocracy.


It is hard to know where to start with a man so infected by Confirmation biases and a sense of his own self-importance. I always Thought the EU was its own Worse enemy, but to paraphrase the Great Ernest Bevin, Not whilst Verhofstad is alive it´s not.
The EU is a critical thinking free zone and Verhoftand is the chief evangelist of its Neo-Liberal Madness.His talk of Populist Governments reveals his deep distaste for and opposition against Social Democracy he is, in short, the Chief Idiot of the EU idiocracy.
Karl Bilt Said recently what is needed is more Europe and Less Brussels. I echo that and add More Europe and less Idiocracy, Less Verhoftad, more subsidiarity and an end of the technocratic Commission. Ideologues of Verhofstads Type talk of preserving the Post WW2 peace and claim credit for it whilst Baiting Mr Putin and Here Mr Trump, whilst promoting Middle East Conflict and assisting in fomenting the Fascist Coup in Ukraine. This Verhostad should be in Prison not contaminating these pages with his Sophistry and bile.

Vlad the Bad, the Impaler and tyrant, the oligarchical, novichock wielding, golden shower snapping, election trolling cyberpunk, mini mi blofeld, pussy stroking barebacked riding, poof bashing, climate denying, ex-spy, commie, red, suspected vampire……Why the EU needs a Penis Enlargement operation.


Europe in the Shadows


With the world increasingly dominated by the US and China, Europe must develop a much stronger common voice on economics, defense, and trade. But this will require Germany, in particular, to rethink some of its long-held positions.



The article is predicated on a singular world view, that is the view that ‘Might is Right’.
In an information age, where distributed systems allow for maximum subsidiarity the opposite is one possible heuristic, and Small may become beautiful.
As ever in this beautiful world if one puts aside one’s own biases just for a moment one can see that many and diverse combinations work.
Martin Novack is a Mathematical Research Biologist, he makes an appearance in a recent documentary series available on Curiosity Stream called why are we here.

‘Mathematical biologist, Martin Nowak, explains the mathematical rules underlying evolution which point to cooperation. Part of a conversation with Ard Louis and David Malone for the ‘Why Are We Here?’ documentary series.’
For the full interview with transcripts and other resources go to ‘

For the EU to rediscover its purpose, its Metier if you will, what is required is the discovery of Subsidiarity and the Mathematics of cooperation, The EU must in fact make 1984 fiction again and turn away from its persistent obsession with becoming Eurasia.
Brexit and a whole alphabet soup of 27 prefixes “getting”” it”””, is for most people labouring under the mistake that the EU and their individual states are Democracies instead of Corporate Oligarchies. The UK Oligarchy faction supporting Brexit wishes to become part of Oceana and not remain hitched to Eurasia.

The people as Burke pointed out in These present discontents following Henry the ivs
able advisor Maximilien de Béthune, 1st Duke of Sully, Marquis of Rosny and Nogent, Count of Muret and Villebon, Viscount of Meaux (13 December 1560 – 22 December 1641) was a nobleman, soldier, statesman, and faithful right-hand man who assisted king Henry IV of France in.

“The people have no interest in disorder. When they do wrong, it is their error, and not their crime. But with the governing part of the State it is far otherwise. They certainly may act ill by design, as well as by mistake. “Les révolutions qui arrivent dans les grands états ne sont point un effect du hasard, ni du caprice des peuples. Rien ne révolte les grands d’un royaume comme un Gouvernoment foible et dérangé. Pour la populace, ce n’est jamais par envie d’attaquer qu’elle se soulève, mais par impatience de souffrir.” These are the words of a great man, of a Minister of State, and a zealous assertor of Monarchy. They are applied to the system of favouritism which was adopted by Henry the Third of France, and to the dreadful consequences it produced. What he says of revolutions is equally true of all great disturbances. If this presumption in favour of the subjects against the trustees of power be not the more probable, I am sure it is the more comfortable speculation, because it is more easy to change an Administration than to reform a people. Edmund Burke, These present discontents.
1769, ”

Regarding the obscenity of choosing Swords over ploughshares, and the present obsession with matters of Marshall conflict is unforgivable. Burke had these words to say.

“A great deal of the furniture of ancient tyranny is worn to rags; the rest is entirely out of fashion. Besides, there are few statesmen so very clumsy and awkward in their business as to fall into the identical snare which has proved fatal to their predecessors. When an arbitrary imposition is attempted upon the subject, undoubtedly it will not bear on its forehead the name of Ship-money. There is no danger that an extension of the Forest laws should be the chosen mode of oppression in this age. And when we hear any instance of ministerial rapacity to the prejudice of the rights of private life, it will certainly not be the exaction of two hundred pullets, from a woman of fashion, for leave to lie with her own husband.”

In the article we hear from the Hawks, now is a time for we doves to assert our own wisdoms.


Richard Bach.
now meet the Fuggers.

Prussian Schooling Aoms Gatto



If we wish to prevent the War Hawks from their final approaches to a Casus Belli of as yet undefined type but sketched in a series of bungled false flags signposting who it is these self-appointed Overlords have already decided will be guilty.

Interpol is looking for a shifty looking character with a penchant for taking his shirt off here is a generalised photofit word picture.


That is one Vlad the Bad, the Impaler and tyrant, the oligarchical, novichock wielding, golden shower snapping, election trolling cyberpunk, mini mi blofeld, pussy stroking barebacked riding, poof bashing, climate denying, ex-spy, commie, red, suspected vampire……


Can you see who it is yet?


War Hawks  = Big Tank small Dick.

#CoxesCodPiece #PeinisEnlargementFatality #BillionaireLosesLifeinSearchforGirth

gore mini me



The EU’s Napoleon Complex, in search of a Military Industrial Complex, It’s not the size its what you do with it?


tonto penis enlargement