Cummings is not the loner he is sometimes portrayed as, and knows power when he sees it. On the day Johnson became prime minister, a scruffy-looking Cummings made sure to frame himself in the corner of a photo taken as the cabinet secretary and the man in charge of the civil service, Sir Mark Sedwill, welcomed the new PM to No 10. Sedwill could well be seen as the epitome of the sort of generalist – a career flitting between the Foreign Office and the Home Office – scorned by Cummings.
“But Gisela Stuart, the former Labour minister who chaired the Vote Leave campaign, who knows both men well, says: “I remember looking at that picture and I thought Sedwill and Dom have a lot in common. Both of them are big picture people, both of them are deeply strategic, both of them are terribly focused. I think they want the same thing.”
https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/extra/09jpSjVUpQ/dominic_cummings_battle_for_downing_street
Make no mistake Cummings is a Bright Spark as well as a class operator, That Sedwill has not managed as yet to cull him begs the questions posed above?
https://www.bitchute.com/video/J4qMaIvuBpLV/
Uncategorized 5 Minutes
Dominic Cummings and Mark Sedwill, When Matter meets antimatter, Process versus Pragmatism. Breaking up Sedwills hegemony? will it happen, can it happen?#TwoFingers2Brino
DOMINIC CUMMINGS, NO ONE LIKES HIM AND HE DON’T CARE! Treasury Committee 20 04 16 14 40 22
Dominic Cummings, No One Likes Him and He Don’t Care! Brino Deplorable, Bad boy and all-round Jolly Good Egg. #Brino #ConquestofDough
In the intervening period, between our chat and it’s being posted, I watched this video from the duo’s Back Catalogue.
Where the bubble politicians go wrong is that they confuse the medium with the message, the medium is the Data and the message is contained in feedback from activists
And For Propaganda, return to Start. See BBC, refer the BBC, See Surveillance Capitalism. See Authoritarianism v Libertarianism. See Rich and Poor.
Not The Grub Street Journal 
rogerglewis on February 16, 2020 at 6:40 am said:
CT: You discuss the need for states to ensure consent: the need to pacify, hypnotize and align populations for continued globalization; more precisely, the need to divert attention from the structural violence of economic policies and the actual violence of militarism. Can you say something about how the issue of global warming relates to this?
DR: Irrespective of whether the so-called ‘climate crisis’ is real, exaggerated or fabricated, it is clear, from the data in my report, that the ethos of global warming was engineered on a global scale and benefits the exploiters of the carbon-economy and, more indirectly, the state.
https://www.counterpunch.org/2019/06/13/from-dollar-hegemony-to-global-warming-globalization-glyphosate-and-doctrines-of-consent/
Reply ↓
austrianpeter
on February 16, 2020 at 7:20 am said:
Counterpunch is a doubtful source for valid information IMHO – I avoid it and worry when someone quotes it.
rogerglewis
on February 16, 2020 at 7:39 am said:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Hello Peter,
I do not dismiss Tims Work I am a passionate advocate both for it and of it.
I have a few minor quibbles with Tim regarding presenting of the underlying axioms of Seeds. Economic Prosperity and Surplus energy are Axiomatic my contention is that the Calculus of the Axioms should be calibrated in energy units and not monetary units.
Dennis Rancourt is an academic whose work is widely quoted in the WikiSpooks Blog. I know the WikiSpooks people and their Work and that of Dennis is of a very high quality and from very able people, some in surprisingly influential positions others hailing from such establishment backgrounds, now retired.
The Interview with Dennis is as set out on the page or screen Peter, the Source is irrelevant, the arguments are what one addresses and not the Per packaged prejudices of where they are published. Colin Todd Hunter ( The Interviewer) is a regular contributor to
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Denis_Rancourt
Heres the Same Article on Global Research, I think you linked to one of their articles yourself a few days back?
https://www.globalresearch.ca/dollar-hegemony-global-warming-globalization-glyphosate-doctrines-consent/5680238
https://wikispooks.com/wiki/Global_Research
rogerglewis
on February 16, 2020 at 7:52 am said:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
The “Democrats” are tied to global finance and push for a global carbon economy, and global “development”, in the image of their malicious interest. Their deep-state base is the CIA and they excel in media and entertainment-industry control.
The “Republicans” are more tied to the USA domestic-energy sector (such as the exploded shale-oil economy), to the army, and to the armament industry. They are more nationalist in their power centre, more into the extraction and wage-slave-production industries in Latin America and Africa, via USA corporations, and have less use for the UN in their manipulations.
http://activistteacher.blogspot.com/
Heres a starter for ten, Dennis’s second tectonic shift is in my own opinion off-target, As he raises the question My response is to seek out what he puts forward as evidence to support that view.
Fast-forward to today: Two global tectonic shifts have and are occurring, which fundamentally threaten the USA/Western ruling elite, in that USA hegemony itself is challenged.
The first global tectonic shift is the continuous rise of Eurasia, economically led by China, with strategic, diplomatic and organizational support from Russia. This coincides with Russian emergence in protecting its national interests in Syria and Venezuela, while offering military technology (S-400 air-defence missile system) that neutralizes USA air dominance, to Turkey and others.
The second global tectonic shift is the increased global abundance of easily extractable fossil-fuel reserves. It turns out that shale-oil is everywhere, as is natural gas; and Chinese coal, not counting secure imports,[8] is plentiful enough to power China, using modern centralized generation and transformation stations, for decades. There is oil and gas in Venezuela, Russia, Syria, Iran… Canada, USA… more places than can easily be controlled to starve competitors, to ensure high prices for preferred producers, and to keep the petro-dollar alive.[6]
rogerglewis on February 16, 2020 at 8:14 am said:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2020/02/14/bps-net-zero-accounting-trick/
LikeLike
ogerglewis on February 16, 2020 at 8:14 am said:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
https://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2020/02/14/bps-net-zero-accounting-trick/
Reply ↓
rogerglewis
on February 16, 2020 at 8:31 am said:
Your comment is awaiting moderation.
Click to access OCLA_Report_2019-1.pdf
THURSDAY, NOVEMBER 21, 2019
Tectonic Shifts Unnerve Both Factions of the USA Ruling Elite
My latest social analysis article, published at Dissident Voice:
https://dissidentvoice.org/2019/11/dear-young-progressives-the-white-supremacist-anti-immigration-anti-political-correctness-free-speech-fascists-are-your-friends/
LikeLike
Second, the very principle of foreign investment works its magic:[20]
“—The broader social impact of NAFTA is captured by Ken Traynor of the Canadian
Environment Law Association who comments, “The old issue of who gets what even
when overall ‘economic efficiency’ may have been enhanced is worth examining.
Consider moving brassière manufacture from Cambridge, Ontario to Juárez on the
Mexican border. $8 per hour wages paid to women in Cambridge to produce brassieres
sold for $20…gets spent in the immediate vicinity of their homes, gets taxed and the firm
generates local municipal taxes too. With NAFTA and a shift of production to the
maquilas, only $2 of the $64 per day wages saved goes to the women in Mexico and
almost none of the municipal and other taxes are paid in Mexico. The $62 per day per
worker gets reallocated to Exxon for fuel to ship things around, to road transport
companies, to brokers, and to the company itself and the spending circle of these guys
is very different than that of the women displaced. And where the money circulates does
matter,” Traynor concludes, “especially to the women in this example.”—” (at p. 55)
The said magic was well understood by all the great classic economic theorists of the industrial
era but has been turned on its head in the false logic of post-Bretton-Woods finance
globalization, and with a vengeance in post-Soviet-Union globalization.[29]
Indeed, the said vengeance is also seen in the other important emergent feature in the new
globalization of the post-Soviet-Union era, which is the following.
The USA predation is no longer solely based on the wealth-extraction conveyer belt of printing
the imposed world currency. In addition, the large USA banks (Wall Street) have bought the
Democratic Party outright and (in addition to their muscle in the USA system) have thereby
acquired free reign to create money for themselves by scamming, and fixing and gaming the
system, while being bailed out when the most daring mega-hustles fail, such as in 2008.[29]
OCLA Report 2019-1 19/77
LikeLike
Throughout all of this, it is important to keep in mind that the USA privilege of being the printer
of the global currency is and remains the mechanistic backbone of the global empire, ever since
the 1971 end of the Bretton Woods system. The US dollar retains its status via international
demand for the US dollar, which, in turn, comes from USA control of the main commodities that
have the greatest global demand and the highest prices in US dollars. These dollar-boosting
“commodities” include: oil and gas, opium, financial debts of nations (serviced in US dollars),
US-dollar currency choice to secure savings and investments, and USA military hardware.
Recently, the USA is proposing exorbitant rent extraction (in US dollars) for its globally
distributed military bases.[71]
Oil and gas are tricky, because Russia, Venezuela, China… have oil, gas, coal… and because
the USA domestic energy sector (shale) is developing, causing a glut, lower energy prices, and
less demand for the US dollar. Whereas a high price of oil helps USA shale, it also helps global
opponents Venezuela, Iran and Russia. One “solution” is military or financial (“sanctions”-
based) destruction of all energy-producing centers that the USA does not control, which may be
present USA strategy?
In all of this, the Western middle and professional classes must consent (by agreement or
inaction), be wilfully blind to what is actually going on, and keep “hope” in their politicians and
the future. The next sections describe the vast social engineering campaigns that were created
following the fall of the Soviet Union. It is not generally appreciated that these campaigns were
OCLA Report 2019-1 35/77
massively organized and implemented immediately following the fall of the Soviet Union. The
said campaigns installed a primacy of select social concerns, thus masking the actual cultural
and social-class restructuring, for those influential classes that can afford the illusion. Selected,
siloed and constructed social concerns were: gender equity, anti-racism, and global
environmentalism.
LikeLike
This, in our opinion, is the process of how the global-warming “religion” was born. Like any
proper religion of an empire, it must be taxable, exploitable by a large layered array of power
players, and useful in motivating massive restructuring campaigns. The alleged danger must be
gigantic, involving humanity and the planet itself, in order to focus attention, and for personal
investment in the religion to be rewarding.
The following section presents data showing that the current global warming ethos was
artificially created following the 1991 fall of the Soviet Union, and later exploited by global
financiers in the mid-2000s to create carbon trading and a carbon economy.
If there is any doubt of the potential for the global warming paradigm to in-effect be a State
“religion”, even justifying war, the words of Noam Chomsky, spoken in 1994 to 1996 and 1999,
merit being noted:[73]
“—For example, suppose it was discovered tomorrow that the greenhouse effect has
been way underestimated, and that the catastrophic effects are actually going to set in
10 years from now, and not 100 years from now or something. Well, given the state of
the popular movements we have today, we’d probably have a fascist takeover—with
everybody agreeing to it, because that would be the only method for survival that anyone
could think of. I’d even agree to it, because there just are no other alternatives around
right now.—”
Following the global-warming section, further sections will present similar data regarding gender
equity and anti-racism, as state ideologies. If the reader finds it difficult to consider that ideology
related to gender and anti-racism can be a surrogate State religion, then we invite them to note
how Russia has in recent years expressly motivated developing policy, ratifying national
statutes, and lobbying the United Nations, to enshrine “family values” and gender-role
OCLA Report 2019-1 37/77
preservation, as questions of sovereignty, national security, and societal stability. It is
interesting that, among others, Western gender-studies academics are pointing this out
regarding Russia.[74]
LikeLike
Prof. Victor Efimov – Lecture for FSB about New World Order (02/25/2003) ENGLISH SUBS!
The main sources that will allow to double GDP are industry, agriculture and the real sector of
production of commodities as well as services. It is high time that we crushed the murderous bank
usury practicies and bring about taxation-and compensatory machinery of market regulation, which
will provide the balanced development of all the sectors of the national economy; eliminate any inter-industry disproportions in prices and investments. It is time we tore the mask of the myth that
insists the market by itself is all-mighty and omnipotent. Unregulated market will inevitably be adjusting itself to maximum profits, which leads to booming usury, porno-business, drug business,
favoring alcohol and tobacco producers, which destroy the statehood. Well-being and prosperity
should be determined by labour itself, and not by which industry one belongs to.
Victor Efimov
newspaper “Chas pik”, May 6, 2004
Click to access 20040506_In_Quest_of_National_Idea.pdf
In Quest of National Idea:
“Energy Ruble” Bound To Be the Hardest Currency
LikeLike
https://notthegrubstreetjournal.com/2020/02/16/sedders-bojo-and-dom-menage-a-trois-or-threes-a-crowd-the-bbcs-inevitable-hit-piece-on-dominic-cummings-chaffersandbray/comment-page-1/#comment-10134
LikeLike
LikeLike
CONCLUSION
Take-home points are as follows:
• The Bretton Woods period (1945 to 1971) had regulated trade balances, regulated
currency exchange, and a US dollar limited by being tied to gold. It was designed to
develop the USA-led capitalist-block nations, against the communist bloc. It produced
social-class-shared development and exhilarating social, cultural, engineering, and
scientific advances. It worked too well. Japan, Western Europe and participating nations
developed too much. The USA ended the Bretton Woods agreement in 1971 and started
the first modern era of predatory globalization, with a second wave following the 1991
dissolution of the Soviet Union.
• “Globalization” is a euphemism for Western USA-led economic predation of countries in
the so-called developing world, of the global under-classes as resources themselves,
and of the Western USA-allied nations to the extent tolerable. From the USA
perspective, the world is its plantation.
• The main administrative instrument for sustained global USA economic pillaging is the
monetary instrument of the unbounded and USA-controlled US dollar as global currency.
The said monetary instrument is essentially a conveyor belt for the continuous transfer of
actual wealth and resources from the world to the USA system.
OCLA Report 2019-1 64/77
• Arguably, the main global concern of the USA, in addition to the classic geopolitical landmass-resource and trade-route considerations, is to enforce and ensure, in tandem, the
US dollar as the global currency.
• Enforcing the US dollar’s status as the global currency includes covert and overt regimechange coups and wars — against administrations vying for currency sovereignty
(sovereignty) — and economic and trade blockades, whereas “ensuring” the US dollar’s
status involves controlling major “commodities” to be purchased in US dollars, thus
securing demand for the US dollar.
• The US-dollar-ensuring “commodities” to be controlled include: energy, opioid drugs,
national debts of debtor nations (excluding the USA), monetary savings of the world elite
(legally or illegally acquired), and USA military hardware and military bases (“protection”)
imposed on allied nations at exorbitant prices; and extend into the always developing
globalized markets of pharmaceuticals (vaccines, etc.), GMO patented crops, and
proprietary high technology (5G, etc.).
• Basically, the modus operandi of the USA Empire has been: any localized world mineral
or essential resource of global importance will be controlled, through whatever means
(military occupation, destruction of capacity, blockade, puppet regime…).
• Globalization is progressive and has occurred in bursts that define globalization eras.
The first era was the post-Bretton-Woods era (1971-1991), starting when the US dollar
was decoupled from gold.
• End results of the post-Bretton-Woods era were: the systematic relative loss of middleclass economic status, and palpable social misery in the West, such as the emergence
of urban homelessness in the 1980s, associated with a predictable major Western
recession (1982 crash, from Third World debt defaults that were written down via Brady
bonds[29]).
• The second globalization era started immediately after the 1991 fall of the Soviet Union.
It was a period of extended and accelerated globalization. The close targets were
traditional USA-allied markets: Canada and Mexico (NAFTA), and Europe (megamergers). Europe somewhat resisted by forming the European economic union.
Investment returns went into the stratosphere, as did CEO salaries. The USA industrial
working class was decimated. China was brought into the capitalist orbit. The
“deplorables versus bobos-and-elites” divide was created, as a major socio-geographic
consequence in the West.
• Measured human consequences synchronous with the post-1991 acceleration of
globalization, mainly affecting the lower-income classes, in the West, include: loss of
welfare safety net, increase of number of single-parent families, threefold increase in
rate of confrontational litigation in the courts, between parents and between individuals
and with the state (“crisis in access to justice”), increased low-income household basicneed incidence (housing, health, safety, work, finance), increased rates of both suicide
and suicide attempt, increased rate of opioid overdose (preceding the opioid epidemic of
the 2010s), and increased rates of chronic asthma emergencies, and asthma
prevalence, in both children and adults.
• Increased leniency in food and drug regulation, and a dramatic increase in the global
use of the herbicide glyphosate starting in 1993 in the USA, were concurrent with post1991 upsurges of diseases and chronic ailments: death from intestinal infections;
incidence of thyroid cancer; death from Parkinson’s disease; prevalence of diabetes;
autism in children of different age groups; and phobia, anxiety disorder, panic disorder.
• The mid-2000s saw Wall Street and the major USA Banks take a more leading role in
globalization, one that is eclipsing the traditional global economic instruments that are
the World Bank and International Monetary Fund. The USA’s so-called subprime
OCLA Report 2019-1 65/77
mortgage crisis, the 2008 crash, the mega-bailouts… are symptoms. The monkeys are
demanding and being allowed more run of the zoo, in which all of the play is in US
dollars.
• The large acceleration and expansion of globalization occurring immediately after the
1991 fall of the Soviet Union is not generally recognized as having been a USA
response to the said fall, but it should be recognized as such. There was a large
acceleration of globalization, both structural and in terms of extension and volume, and
there can be little doubt that it was a response to the newly apparent geopolitical and
ideological fracture.
• At the same time, in express response to the end of the Cold War, the UN undertook an
unprecedented flurry of highly mediatized world conferences. Most notably, the UN
advanced new paradigms of global concern that can be categorized as “climate change”,
“gender-equity”, and “anti-racism”; and put in place declarations and plans to
institutionalize and legalize these new paradigms of global concern.
• The said new paradigms of global concern are siloed and sanitized concerns, in-effect
devoid of social-class, development-disparity, exploitation-structure and nationsovereignty practical dimensions. They became global and state “religions” to pacify,
hypnotize, and align populations for continued globalization, including the first steps
towards a global carbon economy (with carbon traded in US dollars).
• The government, scientific, academic, education, NGO, and media sectors embraced
and promoted the new paradigms of global concern. All globally-controlled corporations
greened and equified. There could never be enough climate change prevention, gender
equity, or racial social justice; and all problems and risks were due to deficits in climate
change prevention, gender equity, and racial social justice.
• A social-justice education industry developed, based on newly-minted “critical race
theory”, which transformed old-fashioned political analysis of exploitative power relations
into awareness of “intersectionality”, and old-fashioned political analysis of social
coalition formation into recognition of white privilege and the unjust burden of being
brown.
• The UN had explicitly called for criminalization (“penal measures”) of “all forms and
manifestations of racism, xenophobia or related intolerance”, and this elite-instigated
desire was made reality with codes of conduct, vast internet censorship, hate-speech
prosecutions, exploding defamation litigation threats, and arrays of sanctions against
unapproved political views.
• The only effective resistance against globalization in the West has become the recent
electoral and demonstrative revolts related to the Brexit vote, the Trump electoral victory,
and the Gilets jaunes movement, all newly understood as the class conflict between the
deplorables and the bobos-and-elites, between the sedentary rural inhabitants (the
“somewheres”) and the globalist urbanites (the “anywheres”).
• Thus, it is no accident that the deplorables express their particular multi-faceted array of
complaints from needed economic revitalization of the rural nation, to rejection of carbon
taxation, to repudiation of the gender-equity and anti-racism programs, including
censorship and political correctness.
Denis Rancourt is a Researcher at the Ontario Civil Liberties Association since 2015. He is a
former Full Professor of Physics at the University of Ottawa, Canada.
LikeLike