Brexit Disgrace, #MayMustGo Escaping the EU Egregor Matrix-assisted by Prof. Victor Efimov.every city or house divided against itself shall not stand.» (Matthew, 12:25).

1 «And Jesus knew their thoughts, and said unto them, Every kingdom divided against itself is brought to desolation; and every city or house divided against itself shall not stand.» (Matthew, 12:25).

28.11.2008 | Analytics, In English, Библиотека | ВП СССР

Bureaucratic despair in EUssr Neo-Liberal Collective  and The global Neo-Con project “PEANAC”, engenders a fretful panic in Britains political Class as they ponder
Britains’ place in the global crisis, and their own place at the grafters Trough
The key question to British and foreign bureaucracy is ” can a
Kingdom divided against itself…”
«PEANAC» — a project of global deceit
Why Blair, Macron,Trudeau, Mrs May and not someone else? — some aspects
 of internal politics and 
Some of the aspects of foreign politics
Forbidden questions in public politics of USA and EUssr and GB
The original sin of statehood.
Fairness in the life of society: political ethics — mercenary or work
An individual and culture
Top secret: the mentality of state power in the USA and in EUssr 22
The Political Class is not free…
Politics, Media,  and Freedom
Globalization and the United States: issues of president / Prime Minister Who calls the shots. Because Markets, Is The Market God or is the Market International Finance and the Military Industrial Complex
Bible – slave’s shackles
Prospective relationship between USA and EU 27 and UK and Northern Ireland.

The May Deal is a New Treaty of Versailles. The European Globalist Tax Farmers and their Uber Alpha Masters of Usury seek to impose the same noose around the necks of the people of these great British Isles that, they applied to the unfortunate peoples of Greece. The Greeks, who have had their own OXI ( No ) Vote betrayed by their political Class. and The Irish and what about so on and so forth ad nauseum.

Wikipedia has an excellent entry on The EU history of referendums, and I have placed them in a spreadsheet to calculate the Effective votes based upon turnout in the different referendums. Of interest are.

AUSTERITY, ENLARGEMENT AND MONETARY UNION. THE END OF EUROPEAN DEMOCRACY. NOT WAVING BUT DROWNING.

• The Danish and Swedish Euro currency Referenda of 2000, AND 2003.
• The Irish Republic referenda of 2001 on the treaty of Nice &
•  the 2008 Treaty of Lisbon referenda both of which were the subject of replays.
• This after the events of 2005, where, a whole slew of referenda were planned but cancelled when the French and Dutch populations decided to take democracy into their own hands.
• And FInaly the Events of the last 5 referenda starting with the Greek Austerity OXI vote.

REFERENDUMS RELATED TO THE EUROPEAN UNION

This is a list of referendums related to the European Union, or its predecessors, the European Communities. Since 1972, a total of 48 referendums have been held by EU member states, candidate states, and their territories, with several additional referendums held in countries outside of the EU. The referendums have been held most commonly on the subject of whether to become a member of European Union as part of the accession process, although the EU does not require any candidate country to hold a referendum to approve membership or as part of treaty ratification. Other EU-related referendums have been held on the adoption of the euro and on participation in other EU-related policies.

1982 by 53% of voters.

CLICK ON GRAPH TO ENLARGE:

EU enlargement and The monetary union had already become a bridge too far for many British Voters by the time of the Maastricht treaty. The  Lisbon was a bridge too far. to mix a metaphor, The straw that broke the camels back. The Irish The Danes, The Swedes, The Dutch pretty much most populations consulted have not given the EU zealots the right answer the first time around and the EU elite simply refused to see the point and have now simply adopted the expediency of not asking.

Two pieces of folk wisdom spring to mind.

´´QUIT WHILE YOU’RE AHEAD´´ANON.

´´IF YOU LOVE SOMETHING, SET IT FREE; IF IT COMES BACKS IT’S YOURS, IF IT DOESN’T, IT NEVER WAS ´´.

Richard Bach.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuf9d3sci-w

The collective punishment dealt out to the German people after WW 1 by the treaty of Versailles and the cororally of that strategy being naturally the second Act of WW1 being WW2 are events not taught as a piece but using the lenses given us by Professor Efimov

lets take a closer look.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kuf9d3sci-w

https://youtu.be/Nd6PjZQZYmE?t=4339

disorganizing the whole economy

https://www.devilskitchen.me.uk/2019/03/reforming-politics-1-state-of-play.html

The internal settlement

What our trade and foreign policy should be (free trade, obviously) is out of the scope of this post: let us focus, instead, on our internal political settlement.

Although I do not necessarily agree with all of the details of the Harrogate Agenda, your humble Devil does agree with many of the principles outlined in it—and including Pete North’s assertions that we need to radically decentralise our political structures.

But, in the spirit of Chesterton’s Fence, let us look at:

• how our governance is currently conducted;
• where we want to get to, and;
• why we might have got to where we are.

Our current government structure

Most cursory students of government will understand our current structures rather similar to this diagram:

In we take account of structures outside of the UK, the world works rather more like this:

In this model: ……https://www.globalpolicy.org/component/content/article/162/27995.html

Globalization Versus Internationalization:

By Herman E. Daly

1999

Introduction

---

Globalization, considered by many to be the inevitable wave of the future, is frequently confused with internationalization, but is in fact something totally different. Internationalization refers to the increasing importance of international trade, international relations, treaties, alliances, etc. Inter-national, of course, means between or among nations.

It’s truly a disgrace John. This lecture by a Russian Spook from 2003 is rather good.
The Neo-Liberal Looting of the Russian Federation after the Fall of the Wall with a Complicit Yeltsin showed clearly how The Post Free Market Capitalism world would use Weaponised financialisation and liberalisation to bring back feudalism. The Political Class are all at this stage by definition various species of Elitists. With nothing but scorn for the Ordinary Citizenry.

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

The attitude is as in this quote. http://ahistoryblog.com/2013/04/30/elizabeth-sutherland-leveson-gower-19th-duchess-of-sutherland-1765-1839-scotch-people-are-of-happier-constitution/
the Countess, who seems to have learned nothing from the recent unpleasantness in France, remarked of some starving tenants:

“Scotch people are of happier constitution and do not fatten like the larger breed of animals”

Leave really must mean leave, the EU design for the people of our islands would make even the Duchess of Sutherland Blush.

Egregore

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Egregore (also egregor) is an occult concept representing a “thoughtform” or “collective group mind”, an autonomous psychic entity made up of, and influencing, the thoughts of a group of people. The symbiotic relationship between an egregore and its group has been compared to the more recent, non-occult concepts of the corporation (as a legal entity) and the meme.

Contents

• 1History
• 2Contemporary usage
• 3See also
• 4Notes
• 5References

History[edit]

The first author to adapt “egregore” in a modern language seems to be the French poet Victor Hugo, in La Légende des siècles (“The Legend of the Ages”), First Series, 1859, where he uses the word “égrégore” first as an adjective, then as a noun, while leaving the meaning obscure.^[1] The author seems to have needed a word rhyming with words ending in the sound “or”. It would not be the only example of word creation by Victor Hugo. However, the word is the normal form that the Greek word ἑγρήγορος (Watcher) would take in French. This was the term used in the Book of Enoch for great angel-like spirits.

Eliphas Lévi, in Le Grand Arcane (“The Great Mystery”, 1868) identifies “egregors” with the tradition concerning the “Watchers“, the fathers of the nephilim, describing them as “terrible beings” that “crush us without pity because they are unaware of our existence.”^[2]

The concept of the egregore as a group thoughtform was developed in works of the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn and the Rosicrucians^[3] and has been referenced by writers such as Valentin Tomberg, notably in his anonymously-penned book Meditations on the Tarot.^[4]

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

28.11.2008 | Analytics, In English, Библиотека | ВП СССР

Bureaucratic despair in Russia and global project “Obama”

Bureaucratic despair in Russia and global project “Obama”

1. Russia’s place in the global crisis
   1. Key question to Russian and foreign bureaucracy with an answer
   2. Kingdom divided against itself…
2. «Obama» — a project of global deceit
   1. Why Obama and not someone else? — some aspects
      1. Aspect of internal politics
      2. One of the aspects of foreign politics
   2. Forbidden questions in public politics of USA and Russia
      1. The original sin of statehood
      2. Fairness in the life of society: political ethics — mercenary or work
      3. An individual and culture
   3. Top secret: mentality of state power in the USA and in Russia 22
   4. Barack Obama is not free…
      1. Obama and Freedom
      2. Globalization and the United States: issues of president Obama
      3. Bible – slave’s shackles
   5. Prospective relationship between USA and Russia

https://web.archive.org/web/20071020135347/http://dotu.ru/category/in-english/

The Future of the Humankind: The Dictatorship of Conscience or the Tyranny of Bible Owners Сентябрь 28, 2006

In the analytical note, there are cited several significant mass media publications regarding the reaction of Muslim countries on the speech made by Pope Benedict XVI on September 12, 2006. In that speech, he told about the Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Palaiologos’s opinion on Islam and Muhammad. The discords between the historically formed Judaism, Christianity and Islam in sociology, in the organisation of the life of society, in economics and theological questions, are shown. It is noted, that those discords of the historically formed confessions follows from and thus express people’s fictions, the self-interest of ruling “elites” and their backstage supervisors. With it, if one considers the conscience to be God’s voice addressed directly to man’s soul, then taking religious traditions as an indisputable truth, free from perversions and mistakes, suppresses the voice of conscience and makes an individual deaf to the call of God.

This peculiarity of the traditional confessions together with their discords in sociological and theological-dogmatic questions poses a threat! It is so since within the conditions of globalization the rousing of such excitement around a return to traditions and adherence to them appears to be the way to a new World War. And the new war is necessary for the “world backstage” as a mean for discrediting Islam and Koran and finishing the biblical project of enslaving mankind.

1. Is the conscience-free within the traditional confessions?
2. God is the best of planners…
3. Conjecture will not avail aught against the truth…
4. Why are hierarchs of churches against the Rightness-Truth?
5. The task is to prevent from unleashing the new world war on the basis of interconfessional enmity.

http://conceptualpower.com/en/home/about-cps-in-briefhttp://conceptualpower.com/en/home/about-cps-in-brief

Z. Brzezinski writes:

“The ultimate objective of American policy should be benign and visionary: to shape a truly cooperative global community, in keeping with long-range trends and with the fundamental interests of humankind. But in the meantime, it is imperative that no Eurasian challenger emerges, capable of dominating Eurasia and thus also of challenging America. The formulation of a comprehensive and integrated Eurasian geostrategy is therefore the purpose of this book” (italicized by Z. Brzezinski) («The Grand Chessboard», p.12, dated: April 1997).

TRIUMPHALIST BRUSSELS DICTATORSHIP HUMILITATES BRITAIN

BRUSSELS BOMBSHELL: No extension without Second Referendum or Softer Brexit

 DID ANYONE SERIOUSLY EXPECT ANYTHING ELSE?

Blair “advice” to the EU fingered by Brussels source

¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤¤

Welcome to life as a vassal captive of the European Union. Acording to The Times this morning, the European Council will veto the spineless British demand for an Article 50 extension unless we agree either to a Second Referendum or an even worse Withdrawal Agreement than the one we’ve got. (Which was, until 24 hours ago, a closed and sacred book which must not be opened otherwise a plague of anthrax-riddled scorpions would surely emerge). It is an entirely predictable bullies’ power grab that vindicates every last British vote to Leave this coven of witches.

https://www.brighteon.com/embed/5831824783001